OpenDNS Forums
The official support and discussion site of OpenDNS
Support
K-12 Forums
Categories
- Administrative
- Adult site blocking
- DNS-O-Matic / dynamic IPs
- Domain blocking
- Domain Name System (DNS) troubles
- Mobile instructions
- OpenDNS services
- Proxies, accelerators, and more
- Router instructions
- Satellite
- Shortcuts
- Wishlists and feature requests
-
Feeds
Vanilla 1.1.4 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.
This discussion has been inactive for longer than 30 days, and is thus closed.
-
I'm seeing a difference in the filtering of adult sites between FamilyShield and OpenDNS Basic. With FS, if I do a Google Image search on "sex" and then click one of the explicit images presented, the resulting page is blocked as expected. When I changed to Basic (because I wanted the more advanced control it offers) I set my filtering level to "High" and tested again, expecting the same sort of results as FS. However, the site loaded, despite being clearly explicit and being filtered by FamilyShield. The test URLs (www.internetbadguys.com etc) or browsing to well known sites (e.g. www.porn.com) indicate that OpenDNS is working, as they are blocked.
Is it intentional that the behaviour of these two filtering methods is different?
I prefer the filtering outcomes of FamilyShield, but I would like the control that Basic gives me. Is it possible that I can have my cake and eat it too?
Please find below my config if this is of any interest here. FYI, I flushed the browser cache (FF10.0.1) prior to flushing the resolver cache.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
C:\>ipconfig /flushdns
Windows IP Configuration
Successfully flushed the DNS Resolver Cache.
C:\>nslookup -type=txt debug.opendns.com.
Server: ds9.warren-au.com
Address: 192.168.111.3
Non-authoritative answer:
debug.opendns.com text =
"server 5.sin"
debug.opendns.com text =
"flags 20 0 2f6 27f00f1189ef3"
debug.opendns.com text =
"id 8977007"
debug.opendns.com text =
"source 27.33.33.45:50001"
C:\>nslookup www.exampleadultsite.com
Server: ds9.warren-au.com
Address: 192.168.111.3
Non-authoritative answer:
Name: www.exampleadultsite.com
Address: 67.215.65.130
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thank you. -
Home Basic and FamilyShield are supposed to raise the same result in case you blocked the same categories in Basic as are blocked by default in FamilyShield.
You had to investigate for particular domains where it seems to be different. -
OK... but I don't know what categories are blocked in FamilyShield. I think that in this case though that's unlikely the issue - this is clearly adult content, I'm not sure what other category it could possibly fall into. I've checked the Knowledge Base but can't find any documentation on how FamilyShield is configured under the covers.
So I can test this further, can I find out exactly what categories FamilyShield blocks? That way I can set my category blocks the same way in Basic and see what happens.
Cheers. -
It was once documented, but isn't now anymore.
http://web.archive.org/web/20110702235551/http://www.opendns.com/home/familyshield
(Yeah, the internet doesn't forget anything.
)
Not sure if something has changed in between.Thankful People: wazzaoz -
Looks like things have sorted themselves out overnight... maybe some things take more than three minutes to propagate.
Thanks for your help. -
"maybe some things take more than three minutes to propagate."
Certainly not if you orderly cleared your caches.
1 to 6 of 6
This discussion has been inactive for longer than 30 days, and is thus closed.